5 comments

  • utopiah 40 minutes ago
  • Meneth 1 hour ago
    "low-latency links", says the article. I wonder if they consider 500 ms ping to be low, or if they want to replace Geostationary with Low Earth Orbit.
    • fidotron 40 minutes ago
      Getting it to work with one end stationary first sounds like a reasonable development plan. LEO adds a lot of complexity, but with huge benefits.

      OTOH the number of engineers that focus on throughput over latency is quite staggering.

      • IrishTechie 35 minutes ago
        I guess if your goal is just to stream aircraft telemetry and black box like recordings then latency may not be high on the agenda.
  • myrmidon 1 hour ago
    I'm really curious how the tracking works in such a system, and how "bad" the beam spread is (my impression is that from the diffraction limit alone the beam has to be spread over at least a ~10m radius after travelling 36000km).

    Some info on the laser itself would also be very interesting (power? wavelength?).

    Really cool project though!

    • amelius 1 hour ago
      > and how "bad" the beam spread is

      The spread makes the tracking easier, I suppose.

  • cm2187 1 hour ago
    But that means you need to have a different laser pointed at every single individual aircraft right? Doesn’t really scale.
    • voidUpdate 24 minutes ago
      If starlink satellites get laser downlink, it might work :P
    • amelius 1 hour ago
      I suppose you can do time-sharing. And use mems-mirrors to quickly move the beam between different targets.
  • xnx 2 hours ago
    Impressive! I believe round trip latency would be 0.5 seconds.
    • 1e1a 2 hours ago
      That's ~162.5 MB in transit at any time
      • kevincox 59 minutes ago
        Excellent for pingfs (https://github.com/yarrick/pingfs)
      • htgb 1 hour ago
        Shouldn't it be 1000/16 = 62.5? Impressive nonetheless, of course!
        • 1e1a 31 minutes ago
          The article says 2.6 gigabits/second which is 2,600,000,000 bits/second, 2,600,000,000b/s * 0.5s / 8 is 162,500,000 bytes, 162,500,000 / 1,000,000 is 162.5 megabytes
      • zppln 2 hours ago
        Weird.