Show HN: adamsreview – better multi-agent PR reviews for Claude Code

 (github.com)

24 points | by adamthegoalie 5 hours ago

7 comments

  • yuppiepuppie 14 minutes ago
    The best code review improvement I have done in my workflow with Claude is using tuicr (https://tuicr.dev).

    It runs locally, YOU review all the code locally, and feedback that to Claude.

    Agents reviewing AI code always felt dirty to me, especially when working on production (non-disposable) code.

  • thesimon 13 minutes ago
    > Runs against your regular Claude Code subscription (Max plan recommended) — unlike /ultrareview, which charges against your Extra Usage pool.

    How expensive is it to run in your experience? In $ or tokens?

  • docheinestages 20 minutes ago
    We seem to be fighting complexity with complexity. Does it really help?
  • stingraycharles 35 minutes ago
    Holy vibe coding batman this looks like a repository with just a bazillion prompts of which there are already a million.

    Seems like it would create a lot of friction and burn a lot of tokens.

  • bilekas 26 minutes ago
    "I pay Claude, to use Claude, to write instructions for Claude, to review code from Claude"

    Have we all just given up?

  • esafak 2 hours ago
    That's looks like a fair bit of ceremony for what it does. Is this representative of the output? https://github.com/adamjgmiller/adamsreview/pull/3
  • claudetester89 42 minutes ago
    [dead]