Ask HN: How do GitHub Copilot and Anthropic Claude compare in cost?
At the company I work at the developers all have a GitHub Copilot subscription. Copilot allows them to use several models, including Claude. From the usage I can actually see that Claude Sonnet and Opus are the most commonly used models. This got me thinking: would it be more efficient to switch to Claude completely? It is difficult to compare the GitHub credits with the Claude tokens, but does someone have experience using both? Is the difference significant?
Anecdotally, you will get more mileage out of a Claude or ChatGPT plan than with a GitHub Copilot plan.
If you're worried about costs, you might try using subagents with a cheaper model or an open model like Kimi/GLM and use Claude/Codex as the orchestrator. This is very efficient.
That's a good suggestion. I actually asked Copilot, but the answer seems to biased. It wouldn't give a clear answer on how the two compare, but it suggested that I use both side by side (copilot for inside the IDE and Claude for 'extra' prompts).
I was hoping someone had some experience with this. I would definitely value the conclusion of an actual human on this :)
Don't be cheeky. I never said anything about trust. And as a rule you should never completely trust AI and always check the results. That doesn't mean you can't use AI.
If you're worried about costs, you might try using subagents with a cheaper model or an open model like Kimi/GLM and use Claude/Codex as the orchestrator. This is very efficient.
I was hoping someone had some experience with this. I would definitely value the conclusion of an actual human on this :)
The larger the text to review the less anyone can comprehend and actually critically understand and comment.
Look back at your history of reviews, which ones actually get more comments and which just get pushed thru.. ?