5 comments

  • 6thbit 7 minutes ago
    It'd be hilarious that meta chose to pay openai. If there was such a deal, would it come to light in any public/official filings?
  • Aeroi 1 hour ago
    author here. I kept digging through the Muse filesystem after my first post hit the front page here this week.

    Going through my logs I found a background agent that used a model called azure/muse-special while building my website. I found this interesting and dug a little deeper.

    The transcript and daemon binary point to an OpenAI model running on Azure. Still unclear which one or why it was selected.

    The runtime also ships with an Anthropic client and a catalogue listing Claude, GPT and Kimi models. I didn’t observe Claude being used in my own sessions, but this is my Part 2 of exploring the Muse file system.

    original post: https://x.com/heypeterjames/status/2103545183400800746

    pete at mouse dot dev

    • haolez 31 minutes ago
      Nice work!

      Are you sure this isn't just a custom model that is API-compatible with OpenAI?

      • embedding-shape 29 minutes ago
        If it's using the same weird (and awful) "backend prompt encryption" pattern and mechanism that Codex also uses (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48905028), then I'd also say it points to OpenAI being involved. Hopefully that shit isn't becoming a more popular pattern, absolutely awful for troubleshooting stuff.
  • Tiberium 30 minutes ago
    I don't really see evidence that it's an "OpenAI" model, the title is IMO very misleading.
    • Aeroi 20 minutes ago
      Meta already serves its own models on Azure under their real names. azure/avocado-compaction-v1 and azure/avocado-memory-flush-v1 are in the same catalog. Those sessions do not come back as gpt_responses_v1 items with rs_ ids and encrypted reasoning.
      • catchnear4321 3 minutes ago
        router makes sense. fill a gap with someone else’s model wearing a mask, swap it out with your model not wearing a mask when (or if) you reach that.

        definitely tracks with alexandr’s hand-wavey influencer turn.

  • GenerWork 15 minutes ago
    I'm not sure I understand why they would route it to other models. It can't be that they don't have enough compute. Maybe worried that the answer from their own models would be bad? Doesn't really make sense, but I could be missing something.
    • Aeroi 11 minutes ago
      i agree, and it's what made me spend time exploring today.

      fair q. call_ ids and gAAAAA blobs arent damning but the rs_ reasoning ids embed a unix timestamp that matches the session to the second, then OpenAI's 819x marker. plus the summary is in OpenAI's summarizer voice.

      its just a best guess.