6 comments

  • tejtm 1 hour ago
  • graboy 10 minutes ago
    Wow, a blanket!
  • AuthAuth 50 minutes ago
    This is gonna be going straight to Ukraine
  • whatsakandr 31 minutes ago
    This headline is wrong. This has nothing to do with thermal cameras. It's "cloaking" by making it appear to have the same bulk thermal properties as it's surroundings.
  • jagged-chisel 54 minutes ago
    Does this work for things that emit heat?
    • SeanAnderson 19 minutes ago
      Doesn't everything emit heat? :)
    • glitchc 47 minutes ago
      Let me answer your question with a question: Does the infrared camera detect emitted heat?
  • SV_BubbleTime 1 hour ago
    [flagged]
    • jdlshore 1 hour ago
      Is dismissing people’s work so rudely how you make yourself feel superior?
      • thin_carapace 1 hour ago
        that guy taught me something new about glass in a snarky fashion , while you delivered pure snark. no comment to add, merely an observation
    • tarpitt 1 hour ago
      you can't make a drone entirely out of glass
      • onion2k 1 hour ago
        Can you fly a drone that's covered with a cloak?
        • mrandish 34 minutes ago
          Probably not very well if the drone is the typical (quad)copter type since the shield will likely obstruct the airflow from the propellers reducing lift. The added weight of the shield is also likely to be a problem in small drones as most are already weight constrained. Although in small electric copters like those used in Ukraine, I'm not sure how often thermal imaging is used as a primary detection vector (due to size, distance and daytime thermal delta from below).

          Thermal is definitely a primary vector in detecting larger drones like the Reaper due to large combustion or jet engines, but in that case the challenge isn't cloaking the drone, it's cloaking the heat of the vented exhaust that's likely leaving a thermal 'contrail' across the sky.